We would not call dual agency more favorable. One agent cannot fully advocate for a buyer trying to pay less and a seller trying to get more at the same time. In a dual-agency arrangement one agent represents both sides, which means the buyer gives up independent representation, and the agent still gets paid, so a fee remains in the picture. The commission-rule changes do not really change that math. We do expect more buyers to approach listing agents directly, especially when inventory is tight and a specific home is the one they want. Going straight to the listing agent does not hand you a discount or an edge on its own, though. Your offer still has to compete on price and terms to get accepted, and you have given up having someone whose only job is your side of the negotiation. We feel strongly that dual agency carries a real conflict-of-interest concern and may be in the early stages of fading out over time, though California and many other states still allow it today. If you are considering it to save money, weigh the savings against losing independent representation on the largest purchase most people make. Often the better move is keeping your own representation and negotiating the compensation terms openly.